From b86d021d47265bac5612f78453f108c2d7ae3e28 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Claudius \"keldu\" Holeksa" Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 15:11:45 +0100 Subject: Thoughts on structure --- typst/report.typ | 15 +++++++++------ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/typst/report.typ b/typst/report.typ index 7849254..8f16f96 100644 --- a/typst/report.typ +++ b/typst/report.typ @@ -18,11 +18,15 @@ the geometry of the porous structure is required. While at heart most numerical modelling approaches such as the Lattice-Boltzmann-Method are based on the Navier-Stokes Equations, here we will take a glance on a more special case. Since we are interested in very viscous cases with our Reynolds number (Re<<1) our base equation reduces itself to the Stokes Equations, -which are well understand in terms of the description by Stokes [dummy]. +which are well understand in terms of the description by Stokes [dummy, I mean the old paper from 1851]. +So the Navier-Stokes equations +@todo insert NS eqs here -and the fluid behaviour surrounding it, requires an understanding of fluid dynamics in the area of microfluidics, -particle-solid interactions and multiphase fluids. +are reduced to + +@todo insert S eqs here +// Rather move this to the lower chapters and use book citations I guess. Well, maybe also Stokes paper. The initial rant is quite fun == Navier @@ -31,10 +35,9 @@ particle-solid interactions and multiphase fluids. == Stokes flow +== Solid-Fluid interaction -// #image("path/to/image.png", width: 10cm) +So while // References == References -1. Author, Title, Journal/Publisher, Year. -2. Another source. -- cgit v1.2.3